Obviously I'm fine with this being merged into core if that's what the group wants to do. :)
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Manger, James H < [email protected]> wrote: > .David, > > > > > I'd like this draft [draft-recordon-oauth-v2-ux-02.txt] to become a > working group document > > > > I disagree. This shouldn’t be a working group document. It should be moved > into the core. > > > > The 2 parameters it defines (language and display) should be moved to the > core OAuth doc now they have obtained some consensus (for which a separate > draft was helpful). > > > > I suggest a sub-section of section 3 “Obtaining End-User Authorization” (of > the core spec) for user interface parameters. > > > > Possible structure: > > > > 3. Obtaining End-User Authorization > > [keep most of the existing paragraphs, except the definitions of the 5 > parameters] > > [Add a paragraph saying various query parameters can be added to the > end-user authorization URI to provide details or preferences about the style > of response, the client application, the scope of access desired, the user, > the user interface etc. Some parameters are defined in the following > sub-sections. Other parameters can be defined by other specifications, or by > services.] > > > > 3.1 Response style parameters > > response_type … > > redirect_uri … > > state … > > > > 3.2 Client parameters > > client_id … > > > > 3.3 User interface parameters > > language … > > display … > > > > 3.4 Scope of access parameters > > scope … > > > > > > -- > > James Manger >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
