Even better, thanks!

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Michael D Adams <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:11 PM, David Recordon <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary)
> >> “The client makes the following request at an arbitrary but reasonable
> >> interval which MUST NOT exceed the minimum interval rate provided by
> >>   the authorization server (if present via the "interval" parameter).”
> >>
> >> My understanding is that the intervals between the client’s subsequent
> >> requests must not be less than the value provided by the “interval”
> >> parameter (if it is present). If that is correct than the intervals
> between
> >> the subsequent requests MUST exceed (or be equal to) the value of the
> >> “interval” parameter.
> >
> > Thanks! Reworded to "The client makes the following request at an
> arbitrary
> > but reasonable interval which MUST NOT be less than the minimum interval
> > rate provided by the authorization server"
>
> It still sounds confusing to me.  Part of the problem is that we're
> talking both about an interval (a length of time) and a frequency
> (requests per unit of time).
>
> How about:
>
> The client makes the next request after an arbitrary but reasonable
> length of time, which MUST be longer than or equal to the minimum
> length of time provided by the authorization server in the "interval"
> parameter if present.
>
>
> I changed "following" to "next" because the former makes it sound like
> the next paragraph will have details about the request.
>
> I changed "at an arbitrary" to "after an arbitrary" since we're
> talking here about lengths of time.
>
> I replaced "interval" with "length of time" to make it clear we're
> talking about the length of time and not the corresponding frequency.
>
> Mike
> --mdawaffe
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to