I withdraw my question. David might not be interested in implementing the client password flow, but he is certainly interested in implementing other flows that involve the client password term. So he's entitled to an opinion on what color the client password bike shed should be painted. =)
(David, no offense, I'm just trying to stick by my guns on the whole "stop screwing up the spec by merging separate use cases into single flows" thing...) On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <[email protected]> wrote: > And that matters how? > > EHL > > > > On Jul 16, 2010, at 16:57, "Brian Eaton" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:37 PM, David Recordon <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I've always found "client password" to be a confusing term. >> >> Are you going to support this flow at all...? >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
