Does the group have an opinion on adding the instance information that I
proposed before* to this UX extension vs. having it live in its own
extension? 

 -- Justin

* http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg03717.html

On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 16:23 -0400, David Recordon wrote:
> Given our implementation experience, an iPad should use "popup" as
> it's a full web browser on a reasonably large screen. Android and the
> iPhone should use "touch". I'd be happy to add clarifying language in
> the extension but am weary about adding the complexity of the client
> requesting dimensions.
> 
> 
> As a side note, this draft is now up
> at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-recordon-oauth-v2-ux-00.
> 
> 
> --David
> 
> 
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Marius Scurtescu
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>         David,
>         
>         Here is some feedback I received internally from Greg Robbins:
>         
>         "Having "display" as an extension is useful, though
>         considering the
>         trend towards tablet devices like the iPad, "touch" and
>         "popup" seem
>         orthogonal rather than mutually exclusive.
>         
>         It would also be nice if the client could indicate the
>         dimensions
>         available for display so the server can make a smarter
>         presentation.
>         Desktop, netbook, tablet, and mobile screen dimensions vary
>         widely
>         now."
>         
>         Marius
>         
>         
>         
>         
>         On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:51 PM, David Recordon
>         <[email protected]> wrote:
>         > I wrote this draft last month based on discussions on the
>         mailing list, the
>         > OpenID user experience extension (which Facebook, Google,
>         and Yahoo! have
>         > deployed), and some OAuth 2.0 implementation experience from
>         Facebook. It
>         > defines language and display preferences which the client
>         can include in
>         > requests to the end-user authorization endpoint.
>         > A previous draft included an immediate mode parameter but
>         further discussion
>         > has shown that it should be removed until identity
>         information is also
>         > addressed. Identity is outside the scope of this particular
>         extension.
>         > I'd like this draft to become a working group document and
>         have done my best
>         > to make it represent the group's consensus. Unfortunately
>         the internet draft
>         > submission process is closed for a few weeks until after the
>         meeting. :-\
>         > Thanks,
>         > --David
>         
>         
>         > _______________________________________________
>         > OAuth mailing list
>         > [email protected]
>         > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>         >
>         >
>         
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to