+1

I am agnostic as to whether this means we define the signatures within the spec or just reference/profile some other work. The fewer number of signature algorithms we have to implement the better:)

George

On 9/23/10 9:43 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
Since much of this recent debate was done off list, I'd like to ask people
to simply express their support or objection to including a basic signature
feature in the core spec, in line with the 1.0a signature approach.

This is not a vote, just taking the temperature of the group.

EHL

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth


_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to