Hi all, based on the feedback from the group on the list we go forward with the document split.
Mike had kindly offered to edit the bearer specification and we are happy to hear that. Thank you Mike. I am looking forward to see the first document. Ciao Hannes On 10/14/10 3:32 AM, "Blaine Cook" <[email protected]> wrote: > Over the past few weeks, the working group debated the issues around > the introduction of signatures and the structure of the specification. > The working group seems to endorse the proposal to split the current > specification into two parts: one including section 5 (bearer token) > and the other including the rest (how to obtain a token), with an > additional specification covering signature use cases. > > This serves as a call for consensus on the proposed editorial work. > Before we proceed with the changes, the chairs would like to ask if > anyone has any concerns or objections against this proposal. > > In addition, the chairs are seeking a volunteer to take over the > bearer token specification (section 5) as editor. > > Please submit your comments by Wednesday, October 20th. > > - The OAuth Working Group Chairs > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
