Thanks Peter, I believe there is genuine interest in Enterprises in seeing OAuth interoperate with existing security infra. Hopefully I can add more to the draft in the near future.
/thomas/ __________________________________________ > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Peter Saint-Andre > Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 7:36 PM > To: OAuth WG > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-hardjono-oauth-kerberos- > 01.txt > > Thanks to Thomas for updating this document, which I continue to think > is quite interesting and helpful... > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: I-D Action:draft-hardjono-oauth-kerberos-01.txt > Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:00:01 -0800 > From: [email protected] > Reply-To: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > > Title : OAuth 2.0 support for the Kerberos V5 > Authentication > Protocol > Author(s) : T. Hardjono > Filename : draft-hardjono-oauth-kerberos-01.txt > Pages : 20 > Date : 2010-12-08 > > This draft proposes an OAuth2.0 profile for Kerberos v5. We compare > the Kerberos protocol flow with the OAuth protocol flow and as far as > possible map the relevant parameters in Kerberos to OAuth parameters. > We propose the use of the OAuth 2.0 message flows and its tokens to > carry Kerberos TGTs and Service Tickets in an opaque manner. > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hardjono-oauth-kerberos- > 01.txt >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
