> Why the early cut-off date? As this is in advance of IETF 80, changes will 
> wait until after Prague in any case.
To inform the discussions @ IETF 80 to determine what else might be needed, 
which goes to your second comment

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lucy 
Lynch
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 5:41 PM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline 
Friday, March 18

On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Mike Jones wrote:

> As you know, the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token draft -03 established the 
> OAuth Errors 
> Registry<http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-03.ht
> ml#errors-registry> to increase interoperability among implementations 
> using the related OAuth specifications.  As you also know, there has 
> been some discussion about whether:
>
> A)  The OAuth Errors Registry belongs in in the Framework 
> specification rather than the bearer token specification,
> B)  The OAuth Errors Registry should continue to be defined in the 
> Bearer Token specification and apply to all OAuth specifications,
> C)  The OAuth Errors Registry should reside in the Bearer Token 
> specification but be scoped back to only apply to that specification, 
> or
> D)  The OAuth Errors Registry should be deleted because the set of 
> errors should not be extensible.
>
> Please vote for A, B, C, or D by Friday, March 18th.

Why the early cut-off date? As this is in advance of IETF 80, changes will wait 
until after Prague in any case.

> I personally believe that A makes the most sense, but given that other 
> points of view have also been voiced, this consensus call is needed to 
> resolve the issue.

Consensus isn't achieved by voting so all you'll get is poll data but that may 
be useful here. While I agree that there has been some discussion, I don't 
think the relative merits of the models have been made clear to the group. A 
fuller discussion of the need for an extensible registry for errors (before 
decided where to home the text) might be more helpful.

- Lucy


>                                                                Cheers,
>                                                                -- Mike
>
>

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to