+1 Phil [email protected]
On 2011-03-21, at 8:50 AM, George Fletcher wrote: > +1 > > On 3/11/11 2:56 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> Why not "bearer_token"? This would be in line with the Authorization scheme >> name. >> >> regards, >> Torsten. >> Gesendet mit BlackBerry® Webmail von Telekom Deutschland >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mike Jones <[email protected]> >> Sender: [email protected] >> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 01:54:00 >> To: OAuth WG<[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Bearer Token draft >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> > > -- > Chief Architect AIM: gffletch > Identity Services Engineering Work: [email protected] > AOL Inc. Home: [email protected] > Mobile: +1-703-462-3494 Blog: http://practicalid.blogspot.com > Office: +1-703-265-2544 Twitter: http://twitter.com/gffletch > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
