That's what I did for MAC. However, this thread is about the v2 spec.

EHL

On Mar 21, 2011, at 16:38, "Manger, James H" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

The bearer spec defines 3 errors (invalid_request, invalid_token, 
insufficient_scope), which accompany 3 different status codes (400 Bad request, 
401 Unauthorized, 403 Forbidden respectively).
Client apps are probably better off switching behaviour based on the HTTP 
status code, and ignoring the error string (perhaps put it in a log, or on a 
debug console so a developer can see it).

It seems like overkill to have:

·         An HTTP status code (eg 401)

·         An HTTP status message (eg Unauthorized)

·         An error string (eg invalid_token)

·         An error_description (eg token is formatted incorrectly)

·         An error_uri (eg <http://api.example.com/error/45> 
http://api.example.com/error/45)

·         The body of the HTTP response (eg an HTML page with extensive details 
about the error and links to the API documentation)

6 sources of error information -- and all for a bearer token that is usually 
opaque to the client app!

Encouraging new error strings to be defined – by having a registry for them – 
is not ideal. Client apps that don’t recognize a value learn nothing. At least 
with HTTP status codes a client app knows the class of error (eg 4xx or 5xx) 
and can behave accordingly even if it doesn’t recognize the specific value (eg 
538).

I’d vote for F) ditch error string/description/uri for the BEARER HTTP 
authentication scheme.

--
James Manger


On 2011-03-21, at 9:48 AM, Mike Jones wrote:


People voted as follows in the poll I conducted on the OAuth Errors Registry:

For A:
                Mike Jones
                Igor Faynberg
                Justin Richter
                Anthony Nadalin

For D or C:
                Eran Hammer-Lahav
                William Mills

Given that twice as many people indicated a preference for A as for any other 
option, that seems to indicate a consensus for A.  Therefore Eran, when you 
update your draft, can you please proceed on that basis?

                                                                Thanks,
                                                                -- Mike


_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to