Eran, you are right about the plan. We have already had a couple of iterations of distilling the separate document down into a security considerations section for inclusion in the spec and will complete if based on feedback Torsten received this week at IETF-80. I am unable to attend
Mark [email protected] wrote on 27/03/2011 09:19:58: > Eran Hammer-Lahav <[email protected]> > Sent by: [email protected] > > > Subject > > Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authors, Contributors, Acknowledgement > > I guess you can sort it out at the meeting. I thought the plan was > to distill the security document into a shorter (but not > insignificant) security consideration section (I was expecting > something in the range of 10-20 pages), and also publish the model > document with added details. > > EHL > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 1:10 AM > > To: Eran Hammer-Lahav > > Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; OAuth WG > > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authors, Contributors, Acknowledgement > > > > That's what I thought was the plan. > > (Assuming the working group agrees to work on a separate document. I > > would support it.) > > > > On Mar 27, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: > > > > > So the new plan is for you to provide the text for the security > section and > > just publish their work as a separate RFC as the same time? > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
