Sadly, I am not in Prague. Given the similarities between the JWT and SAML grant drafts, please let me know if anything substantial comes out of the JWT discussions. Thanks!
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Mike Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > To this, I'd like to add discussion of draft-jones-oauth-jwt-bearer -- the > JWT equivalent of draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer. In specific, I'd like us to > consider taking this up as a working group item. > > Thanks and see you in the morning! > > -- Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Hannes Tschofenig > Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 12:13 PM > To: OAuth WG > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda Update > > After a chat with Blaine we have an updated agenda proposal: > > First, we need to cover our working group items: > > -draft-ietf-oauth-v2 > *Security Consideration Section (Torsten) *Error Code registry (Mike) *Client > Assertion Credentials (Mike) *Anything else? > -draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer > *Open issues? > -draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer > *Open issues? > > Then, we jump into the presentations of the individual submissions: > > *OAuth Security (Torsten) > *JSON Web Token (Mike) > *Use Cases (Zachary) > *Simple Web Discovery (Mike) > *Dynamic Client Registration (Thomas, if time permits) *Token Revocation > (Torsten, if time permits) *Chain Grant Type (Hannes on behalf of Phil, if > time permits) > > Then, we will solicit your feedback on the rechartering. The feedback from > the presentations earlier will be taken into consideration. > > Hope that works for you! > > Ciao > Hannes & Blaine > > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
