Yes, that's fine with me.
Thanks,
George
On 6/10/11 4:20 AM, David Recordon wrote:
George, Doug and Eran are you alright with the Bearer token spec using
the parameter name "access_token" as well?
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Marius Scurtescu<[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Mike Jones<[email protected]> wrote:
If you can drive a consensus decision for the name "access_token", I'd be glad
to change the name in the spec. I agree that the current names are confusing for
developers.
At Google we are getting the same feedback, that it is confusing for
developers. It would definitely help if we could change the name to
"access_token".
Marius
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
