Thanks, y'all, for the responses. I've heard from others that a library can end
up taking more time to figure out than just coding it fresh because the latter
is just that simple, but I suspect this is a YMMV kind of thing. And it seems
there's universal agreement that a MAC library would be a very good idea
regardless.
Eve
On 24 Jun 2011, at 1:48 PM, Teo Hui Ming wrote:
> Hi, I notice most open source OAuth2 client/server libraries
> implementation is only up to draft 10.
>
> Here's a quick raw list in case you interested:
> https://github.com/teohm/teohm.github.com/wiki/OAuth
>
> Anyone knows if there is an open source OAuth2 server reference
> implementation that reflects the latest draft 16, and unit-tested
> against the security considerations in section 10?
>
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Eve Maler <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Zero response from the other list. Any suggestions from folks here?
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> From: Eve Maler <[email protected]>
>>> Date: 20 June 2011 4:54:56 PM PDT
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: [oauth] Good list of OAuth open source?
>>> Reply-To: [email protected]
>>>
>>> The list at http://oauth.net/code/ seems really random and out of date.
>>> Does anyone have a current list of open-source software that supports
>>> OAuth, including drafts of 2.0?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Eve
>>
>>
>> Eve Maler http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog
>> +1 425 345 6756 http://www.twitter.com/xmlgrrl
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Teo Hui Ming
>
Eve Maler http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog
+1 425 345 6756 http://www.twitter.com/xmlgrrl
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
