Thanks Peter & Barry, I'll proceed under those assumptions.
Also, just fyi that I just posted a new draft of this at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-campbell-oauth-urn-sub-ns-01 that has only a couple minor editorial changes. I hope to get to the SAML draft soon. On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpe...@stpeter.im> wrote: > On 7/31/11 8:45 AM, Barry Leiba wrote: >> Given the progress that the OAuth WG has made, the fact that we're in >> WGLC on two major documents, and the fact that the SAML draft depends >> upon what's in here, I have no issue with adding this as a WG item. >> Stephen, do you agree with that? (I know that Stephen's away for a >> bit, and won't be responding for a while. This can wait until he gets >> back, and in the meantime the SAML doc can assume that this one is >> going forward.) > > I think that's a good path forward. > > Peter > > > -- > Peter Saint-Andre > https://stpeter.im/ > > > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
