<hat type="secdir"/> I've been loosely following this group, probably not as closely as I should have. I'll put it in my queue to do a review of the current doc as a way of getting back in the fray.
--Richard On Aug 8, 2011, at 1:59 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: > Thanks. > > But this still puzzles me. After two years in the application area where IMO > this working clearly belongs, we were moved to the security area under the > premise of increased review and engagement from the security area. > > EHL > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba >> Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 8:29 PM >> To: Eran Hammer-Lahav >> Cc: OAuth WG >> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Security area review >> >>> Did the chairs issue a last call request to anyone in the security >>> area? I thought the whole point of moving this working group from apps >>> to security was to increase the review and participation of that area. >>> So far I have seen absolutely nothing to indicate any such >>> contribution. I would like to know what actual actions are being taken to >> turn this promise into reality. >> >> There'll be a security directorate review when we send the doc to the IESG. >> I >> can certainly ask Sam to schedule a review now, instead of waiting, and I'll >> do >> that. >> >> Barry, as chair > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
