On 09/07/2011 10:17 AM, Igor Faynberg wrote:
+300 (if I can do that) to indicate my strong agreement. But if somehow it is decided to add a few sentences on saying that OAuth cannot deal with key-logging, I will insist on adding two sentences each on OAuth being unable to deal with 1) earthquakes, 2) certain contageous diseases, etc., [...]

Please, enough of the hyperbole. It is not clear or obvious whether this is
a protocol issue or not. It brings into question whether the protocol is worth deploying at all, and that is surely an issue. As far as I can tell, there is very little upside to deploying OAuth in the general case over, say, Basic+TLS. In
fact, you guys have convinced me that OAuth gives inferior protection at
considerable expense for all concerned.

Mike
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to