Although this isn't related to changes made since -20, it should probably still be done (unless it's something for the final RFC editors?) and shouldn't be much of a change.
The example in section 4.5 [1] uses the "old" grant type URI for the SAML grant type (http://oauth.net/grant_type/saml/2.0/bearer) and it should probably be updated to use the "new" and hopefully final and stable one (urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:saml2-bearer). Here's the example from the latest SAML draft [2]: POST /token.oauth2 HTTP/1.1 Host: authz.example.net Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded grant_type=urn%3Aietf%3Aparams%3Aoauth%3Agrant-type%3Asaml2- bearer&assertion=PEFzc2VydGlvbiBJc3N1ZUluc3RhbnQ9IjIwMTEtMDU [...omitted for brevity...]aG5TdGF0ZW1lbnQ-PC9Bc3NlcnRpb24- Also the source xml, if that's useful: <artwork> <![CDATA[ POST /token.oauth2 HTTP/1.1 Host: authz.example.net Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded grant_type=urn%3Aietf%3Aparams%3Aoauth%3Agrant-type%3Asaml2- bearer&assertion=PEFzc2VydGlvbiBJc3N1ZUluc3RhbnQ9IjIwMTEtMDU [...omitted for brevity...]aG5TdGF0ZW1lbnQ-PC9Bc3NlcnRpb24-]]> </artwork> Thanks, Brian [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-21#section-4.5 [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-08#section-4 On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <e...@hueniverse.com> wrote: > I’d like to ask the chairs to declare a 2 weeks review period limited to > changes made since -20 after which we will either declare -21 as the final > WG draft or publish a quick -22 with all changes agreed prior on the list > and no additional WG review period. Of course, the chairs can change all > these rules as they see fit. > > > > EHL > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
