The charset is restricted so no issues. From: William Mills [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2011 7:46 AM To: Eran Hammer-Lahav; OAuth WG Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] MAC: body-hash
I haven't read the MAC spec recently enough, did you already deal with the character set issue (if there was one) comparable to the ones in the Bearer spec? I am +1 on the -body_hash +ext change. ________________________________ From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: OAuth WG <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2011 7:39 AM Subject: [OAUTH-WG] MAC: body-hash I want to reaffirm our previous consensus to drop the body-hash parameter and leave the ext parameter. Body-hash as currently specified is going to cause significant interop issues due to character (and other) encoding issues. Providers who desire to MAC the body can define their own ext use case. Let me know if you have an objection to this change. EHL _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
