Hello, Just noticed that RFC2616 and RFC2617 are put under Informative References but are only referenced in Document History. Will they be removed before publication as an RFC?
Regards, Franklin -------------------------------------------------- From: "Mike Jones" <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, 31 January, 2012 03:42 To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token Specification Draft -16 > Draft 16 of the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token > Specification<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer> has been > published. This version contains a proposed resolution to the auth-param > syntax issue that has been reviewed by Julian Reschke, Mark Nottingham, and > the OAuth WG chairs. It also addresses the Gen-ART review comments by Alexey > Melnikov. > > It contains the following changes: > > * Use the HTTPbis auth-param syntax for Bearer challenge attributes. > * Dropped the sentence "The realm value is intended for programmatic use > and is not meant to be displayed to end users". > * Reordered form-encoded body parameter description bullets for better > readability. > * Added [USASCII] reference. > > The draft is available at: > > * http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-16 > A HTML-formatted version is available at: > > * http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-16.html > > -- Mike > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
