On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:27 PM, William Mills <[email protected]> wrote:
> You're asking about MAC tokens right? The term "bearer" on this list > usually refers to the Bearer Token draft style stuff. > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Erlend Hamnaberg <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 7, 2012 11:02 AM > *Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] Implementing MAC bearer > > Hi guys and gals. > > I am trying to implement the MAC bearer within a client library. > > Searching the Archive I find that the current draft version of the MAC > bearer is incorrect. > > For instance the body-hash is no longer supported. Is there a new draft > planned soon? > For implementers there would be great help in more examples. > That way we can write test cases which conforms to the spec more easily. > > Best regards > > Erlend > Yes, of course. Sorry for the confusion. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hammer-oauth-v2-mac-token-05 -- Erlend
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
