So what is the usecase of response_type=token%20code ?
I thought, in that usecase, token was for the client's client-side component, 
code was for the client's server-side component, and both of them have the same 
client_id.

--
nov

On Mar 12, 2012, at 12:57 AM, Eran Hammer <[email protected]> wrote:

> If you have two components each with different security profile, you must 
> assign each a different client_id. Otherwise, there is no way to enforce the 
> rest of the spec's security requirements.
> 
> EH
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
>> Of nov matake
>> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 8:25 AM
>> To: [email protected] WG
>> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Clarification of "client application consisting of 
>> multiple
>> components"
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I just found this sentence in the latest draft.
>> 
>> Does it mean "an application consisting of server-side and client-side
>> component (eg. foursquare iPhone app) MUST have separate client_id for
>> each component" ?
>> Or can I image something like Facebook is doing right now? (register each
>> component for a single client_id separately)
>> 
>> ==
>> A client application consisting of multiple components, each with its own
>> client type (e.g. a distributed client with both a confidential server-based
>> component and a public browser-based component), MUST register each
>> component separately as a different client to ensure proper handling by the
>> authorization server.  The authorization server MAY provider tools to manage
>> such complex clients through a single administration interface.
>> ==
>> 
>> --
>> nov <[email protected]>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to