Citing from Sean's dicuss
(<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer/ballot/#sean-turner>):
1) I'm hoping the answer to this one is "there's no problem" but I gotta ask and
maybe the APPs ADs can confirm: Is there any issue with this specification
using ABNF from [I-D.ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging] while OAUTH 2.0 uses [RFC5234]?
The ABNF from HTTPbis is a superset of RFC 5234 in that it defines a
list rule for readability. I don't think that this rule is used anymore
in the bearer spec, so it can just say it's using RFC 5234.
Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
