OK. I'll do that. Not hard.
Will folks want to discuss the individual submission here? Or will that be in
apps-discuss?
Is it informational if it does IANA registry actions?
Thanks,
-bill
>________________________________
> From: Derek Atkins <[email protected]>
>To: William Mills <[email protected]>
>Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 5:06 PM
>Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Oauth 2 and discovery
>
>Hi,
>
>On Tue, June 12, 2012 7:19 pm, William Mills wrote:
>> If endpoint discovery is to be via WebFinger (LRDD/XRD) we need there
>> relations defined for the OAuth endpoints I had that in
>> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-oauth-00.txt section 7.3,
>> but I've ripped all the discover stuff out of there.
>>
>> This seems more appropriate in the OAuth 2 core spec, but it's really late
>> to put it there. Should it get added as part of the WF draft? As a
>> separate I-D with just the IANA registry items?
>
>I think it's a little late to add this to the core spec now.
>
>I would say that you should just write up a separate draft that has the
>IANA registry items and other ancillary data necessary. It could probably
>go through as an informational draft, too, and possibly even an individual
>submission.
>
>> -bill
>
>-derek
>
>--
> Derek Atkins 617-623-3745
> [email protected] www.ihtfp.com
> Computer and Internet Security Consultant
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
