I am still Ok with -22, but I have 1 new comment raised by introduction of the base64 ABNF non terminal:

I think it would be worth adding a comment for b64token that points to the base64 RFC. The current ABNF is too permissive (arbitrary number of "=" allowed at the end) and there are enough broken base64 parsers around (parsers that ignore everything after a "=", parsers that support arbitrary number of "=" at the end, etc.), so we shouldn't encourage creation of new ones.

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to