Hi Hannes,
I'm unfortunately had to cancel my trip to IETF-84. Phil will cover the
status of the threat model document. But none of the authors of the
Revocation Draft will be attending. So I would ask you to postpone the
presentation of this I-D to the next IETF meeting as well.
best regards,
Torsten.
Am 23.07.2012 17:02, schrieb Thomas Hardjono:
Hannes, Derek,
Would it possible to postpone presentation/discussion of the Dyn-Reg
draft (Dynamic Client Registration Protocol) to the Atlanta/November
IETF meeting?
The reason is that none of the proposers will be attending the
Vancouver IETF in-person.
Thanks.
/thomas/
__________________________________________
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf
Of Hannes Tschofenig
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 1:58 PM
To: John Bradley
Cc: [email protected] WG
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting
requested
Hi all,
I have uploaded an agenda for the meeting.
I am assuming that all these items do not require discussion time
anymore:
* draft-ietf-oauth-assertions
* draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer
* draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns
* draft-ietf-oauth-v2
* draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer
Hence, we can focus on the new items. As discussed in the mail below
I
put a separate slot for discussion of the holder-of-the-key/MAC
token
security discussion on the agenda. I would suggest that a couple of
us
meeting during the IETF week to work together on a presentation that
provides some concrete suggestions for next steps to the rest of the
group.
I also put the following persons on the spot for the presentations
of
working group items:
- OAuth Dynamic Client Registration Protocol (Thomas)
- JSON Web Token (JWT) (Mike)
- JSON Web Token (JWT) Bearer Token Profiles for OAuth 2.0 (Mike)
- Token Revocation (Torsten)
- SAML 2.0 Bearer Assertion Profiles for OAuth 2.0 (Brian)
- OAuth Use Cases (Zachary)
Let me know if you want someone else to give the presentation.
As a preparation for the meeting it would be good if you could
(a) identify the open issues with your document, and
(b) find one or two reviewers to have a look at your document during
the next two weeks.
Ciao
Hannes
On Jul 15, 2012, at 5:59 PM, John Bradley wrote:
Yes we need to get clearer on the the threats and use cases.
I think Phil Hunt has some though there is likely overlap.
Part of the problem with MAC was people never agreed on the
threats
it was mitigating.
I can present something or coordinate with Tony or Phil.
John B.
On 2012-07-14, at 9:36 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote:
How about a few min on proof-of-possession requirements? I can
present our use cases and requirements
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Mike Jones
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 4:42 PM
To: Hannes Tschofenig; [email protected] WG
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF
meeting
requested
I'm willing to do 5 minutes on the status of the Core and Bearer
documents.
I'm willing to give an update on JWT and the JWT Bearer -
probably
15 minutes. It's probably good that we're a day after the JOSE WG
meeting, given the JWT dependency upon the JOSE specs.
I'm willing to be part of a discussion on the Assertions draft,
but
would appreciate doing this with Brian and/or Chuck - I'm guessing
15
minutes for that as well. (I'm not certain this will be needed, but
I'd like to review the recent changes before saying that it's not.)
Looking forward to seeing many of you in Vancouver!
-- Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 12:46 AM
To: [email protected] WG
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting
requested
Hi all,
I have requested a 2,5 hour slot for the upcoming meeting.
While the next meeting is still a bit away it is nevertheless
useful
to hear
* whether you plan to attend the next meeting, and
* whether you want to present something.
I could imagine that these documents will be discussed:
* draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg
* draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token
* draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer
* draft-ietf-oauth-revocation
* draft-ietf-oauth-use-cases
To the draft authors of these docuemnts: Please think about the
open
issues and drop a mail to the list so that we make some progress
already before the face-to-face meeting.
I am assume that the following documents do not require any
discussion time at the upcoming IETF meeting anymore:
* draft-ietf-oauth-assertions
* draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer
* draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns
* draft-ietf-oauth-v2
* draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer
Ciao
Hannes
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
