In my personal view, 1.0a is technically obsoleted but still useful,
especially for cases where 2 doesn't offer a solution right now. If you
can specify a way to bind to different token/signature types, you'd be
able to leave yourself the flexibility.
-- Justin
On 08/14/2012 03:21 PM, William Mills wrote:
What's the general opinion on 1.0a? Am I stepping in something if I
refer to it in another draft? I want to reference an auth scheme that
uses signing and now MAC is apparently going back to the drawing
board, so I'm thinking about using 1.0a.
Thanks,
-bill
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
