> > 
> >      The example of asymmetrical key is flawed. Without trust (e.
> g. Certificate) implemented, Client can use any pk/sk generated by 
> itself to confirm 
> > its knowledge of sk. 
> 
> It is perfectly fine but there are obviously lots of details 
> missing. If you look at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tschofenig-
> oauth-hotk-01 then see the details. 

it says in draft-tschofenig-oauth-security-00 that "When the Client 
requests an access token the Authorization Server creates an ephemeral 
public / privacy key pair  (PK/SK) and places the public key PK into the 
protected token."
--- AS selects the  Pk,sk, and sends sk, pk to Client
in draft-tschofenig-oauth-hotk-01, it says Client includes pk_info in 
request, it implies sk,pk are chosen by client.

They are different. And selecting pk,sk by client is reasonable.
But how pk and access token are bound ?

> > 
> > 
> > 3. In section 4.4 summary 
> >    "The weak point with this approach..is.. increased complexity: 
> a complete key distribution protocol has to  be defined." 
> > Don't have to be always the case. 
> > For example, client send H(R) in token request to AS, AS includes 
> the H(R) in the token, and client sends (token,R) to RS, 
> > RS can verify the key confirmation by client without using 
> preinstalled key between AS and RS. 
> 
> What you describe is a key distribution protocol.
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> > [email protected] 写于 2012-09-06 22:25:03:
> > 
> > > Hi all, 
> > > 
> > > following the discussions at the last IETF meeting and the weeks 
> > > before Phil and I had prepared a short writeup about the threats, 
> > > and the security requirements. 
> > > 
> > > Here is the document: 
> > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tschofenig-oauth-security-00
> > > 
> > > Please share your views with us.  Is there something missing? Is 
> > > further explanation needed? With what do you agree / disagree?
> > > 
> > > Ciao
> > > Hannes & Phil
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > OAuth mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> > > 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to