Pedro - the best way to move this forward is to make a proposal or
describe some use-cases.
My own guess is that we also need a broader discussion of different
client-types and their deployment models.
For example, there are clients that are delivered through a secured
process to tablets or devices or desktops. Another category of
clients are services hosted by an application server, these have quite
different characteristics as well.
- prateek
-
Thanks for the response.
I know that this area is work in progress. However, I've looked into
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-00 and didn't
found much about this subject.
What is the best place to follow this discussion? This mailing list?
Thanks
Pedro
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Phil Hunt <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Pedro,
AFAIK this is still a TODO within the current charter.
Phil
@independentid
www.independentid.com <http://www.independentid.com>
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
On 2012-10-18, at 9:06 AM, Pedro Felix wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Where can I find more information about the dynamic registration
of client application instances?
> The idea is that each installed application instance has a
different id, eventually related to the "general" application id.
>
> It also would be interesting if this instance id was the result
of an activation process, where the instance is attached to a
device or to an user (e.g. confimed email address).
>
> Thanks
> Pedro
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
