On 11/12/2012 10:09 PM, Phil Hunt wrote:
> Leif,
>
> I've read this a couple of times and I think I'm getting lost in
> partial SAML vs. OAuth terminology. As a result, I thought you were
> saying:
>
> 1. It isn't practical to issue client credentials even with Dynamic
> Registration
> 2. You want to re-use key management already in place with OAuth2.
>
> These statements seem to be in conflict. Did you mean to say for
> number 2 that you want to re-use key management already in place for SAML?
>
yep - "for" as in "for use by"
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
