BTW, the SAML purists would probably point out that I should have written "SAML 2.0 assertions" - not "SAML 2.0 tokens" below. :)
From: Justin Richer [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 1:42 PM To: Mike Jones Cc: [email protected] WG Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Additional informative references for Assertions draft +1, cross references are a good thing when documents are split up. On 12/19/2012 04:33 PM, Mike Jones wrote: I'd suggest adding informative references to the OAuth SAML and JWT Profile documents in the Assertions draft. After this sentence of the Introduction: In order to be implementable, companion specifications are necessary to provide the corresponding concrete instantiations. I'd add the following: For instance, the SAML 2.0 Bearer Assertion Profiles for OAuth 2.0 [draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer] defines a concrete instantiation for SAML 2.0 tokens and JSON Web Token (JWT) Bearer Token Profiles for OAuth 2.0 [draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer] defines a concrete instantiation for JWT tokens. Doing that will help readers find the concrete instances from the abstract specification. Thanks, -- Mike _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
