thanks! nov
On Jan 10, 2013, at 8:24 AM, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 01/09/2013 11:02 PM, Derek Atkins wrote: >> Barry Leiba <[email protected]> writes: >> >>>> Corrected Text >>>> -------------- >>>> Resource owners cannot revoke access to an individual third party without >>>> revoking access >>>> to all third parties, and must do so by changing their password. >>>> >>>> Notes >>>> ----- >>>> The text was originally "their" but changed to "the third party's" between >>>> the last draft and RFC. >>>> However, "their" means "resource owners'", not "the third party's". >>> >>> Yes, this appears to be a change the RFC Editor made that the authors >>> didn't notice in AUTH48. But the RFC Editor change it from "their" >>> because "their" wasn't clear. Changing it back to "their" won't help >>> that. I suggest editing the corrected text to "by changing the >>> resource owner's password" before marking this as Verified. >> >> Yep, I suggested that same change in a private email to Stephen, so I >> would prefer this modification. > > Ok, assuming nobody objects I'll verify this that way tomorrow. > > Cheers, > S > >> >>> Barry >> >> -derek > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
