In OAuth, we have redirect_uri not redirect_url; should this be
registration_access_uri for consistency? -T

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:23 AM, John Bradley <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think registration_access_url is OK.    I haven't heard any better names
> yet.
>
> John B.
>
> On 2013-02-20, at 1:04 PM, Mike Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  For what it’s worth, the name “registration_access_url” was chosen to be
> parallel to “registration_access_token”.   It’s the place you use the
> access token.  And it’s where you access an existing registration.  I’m
> against the name “client_metadata_url” because it’s not metadata you’re
> accessing – it’s a registration you’re accessing.  For the same reason, I
> don’t think the name “client_info_url” gives people the right idea, because
> it doesn’t say anything it being the registration that you’re accessing.**
> **
>
> If you really want us to change this, having read what’s above, I could
> live with “client_registration_url”, but I don’t think a change is actually
> necessary.  (But if we are going to change it, let’s do it ASAP, before the
> OpenID Connect Implementer’s Drafts are published.)****
>
>                                                             -- Mike****
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf
> Of *Nat Sakimura
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 20, 2013 7:58 AM
> *To:* <[email protected]>; Richer, Justin P.; John Bradley
> *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-06.txt****
> ** **
> Thanks Justin.
>
> Even if we go flat rather than doing JSON Structure, the "Client
> Registration Access Endpoint" is not a good representative name.
>
> What it represents is the client metadata/info.
> It is not representing "Client Registration Access". ****
> What does "Client Registration Access" mean? ****
>
> Does UPDATing "Cleint Registration Access" make sense?
>
> Something in the line of "Client Metadata Endpoint" and
> something like "client_metadata_url" or "client_info_url" is much better.
>
> Nat****
> 2013/2/15 Richer, Justin P. <[email protected]>****
> Everyone, there's a new draft of DynReg up on the tracker. This draft
> tries to codify the discussions so far from this week into something we can
> all read. There are still plenty of open discussion points and items up for
> debate. Please read through this latest draft and see what's changed and
> help assure that it properly captures the conversations. If you have any
> inputs for the marked [[ Editor's Note ]] sections, please send them to the
> list by next Thursday to give me opportunity to get any necessary changes
> in by the cutoff date of Monday the 22nd.
>
> Thanks for all of your hard work everyone, I think this is *really* coming
> along now.
>
>  -- Justin****
>
> On Feb 15, 2013, at 4:54 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol Working
> Group of the IETF.
> >
> >       Title           : OAuth Dynamic Client Registration Protocol
> >       Author(s)       : Justin Richer
> >                          John Bradley
> >                          Michael B. Jones
> >                          Maciej Machulak
> >       Filename        : draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-06.txt
> >       Pages           : 21
> >       Date            : 2013-02-15
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   This specification defines an endpoint and protocol for dynamic
> >   registration of OAuth Clients at an Authorization Server.
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg
> >
> > There's also a htmlized version available at:
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-06
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-06
> >
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OAuth mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth****
>
>
> ****
> ** **
> --
> Nat Sakimura (=nat)****
> Chairman, OpenID Foundation
> http://nat.sakimura.org/
> @_nat_en
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to