+1

Sent from my iPhone

On 21 maj 2013, at 00:21, "nov matake" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

+1

On 2013/05/21, at 5:23, Edmund Jay <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

+1 for keeping names as is.

________________________________
From: Justin Richer <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Mon, May 20, 2013 8:10:13 AM
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Proposed Syntax Changes in Dynamic Registration

Phil Hunt's review of the Dynamic Registration specification has raised a 
couple of issues that I felt were getting buried by the larger discussion 
(which I still strongly encourage others to jump in to). Namely, Phil has 
suggested a couple of syntax changes to the names of several parameters.


1) expires_at -> client_secret_expires_at
2) issued_at -> client_id_issued_at
3) token_endpoint_auth_method -> token_endpoint_client_auth_method


I'd like to get a feeling, especially from developers who have deployed this 
draft spec, what we ought to do for each of these:

 A) Keep the parameter names as-is
 B) Adopt the new names as above
 C) Adopt a new name that I will specify

In all cases, clarifying text will be added to the parameter *definitions* so 
that it's more clear to people reading the spec what each piece does. Speaking 
as the editor: "A" is the default as far as I'm concerned, since we shouldn't 
change syntax without very good reason to do so. That said, if it's going to be 
better for developers with the new parameter names, I am open to fixing them 
now.

Naming things is hard.

 -- Justin
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to