Hi
IMHO the fact the transformation of the code_verifier is pluggable is a
major improvement, and the whole text somehow reads much easier (few
minor typos in the introduction).
The only doubt is about the 'MUST' bit where the client is expected to
figure out that the server supports this spec. Not a problem for me as I
don't work on implementing a client, but it seems like it makes the
whole process suddenly much more complex than may be it should be.
Would it make sense to change 'MUST' to 'RECOMMENDED' and have the
authorization service return a code_verifier_accepted or some similar
response parameter, alongside with the 'code', instead ? Not really though,
Cheers, Sergey
On 19/10/13 11:15, Nat Sakimura wrote:
Incorporated the discussion at Berlin meeting and after in the ML.
Best,
Nat
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: ** <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: 2013/10/19
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-sakimura-oauth-tcse-02.txt
To: Nat Sakimura <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, John
Bradley <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>,
Naveen Agarwal <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
A new version of I-D, draft-sakimura-oauth-tcse-02.txt
has been successfully submitted by Nat Sakimura and posted to the
IETF repository.
Filename: draft-sakimura-oauth-tcse
Revision: 02
Title: OAuth Symmetric Proof of Posession for Code Extension
Creation date: 2013-10-19
Group: Individual Submission
Number of pages: 8
URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sakimura-oauth-tcse-02.txt
Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sakimura-oauth-tcse
Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakimura-oauth-tcse-02
Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-sakimura-oauth-tcse-02
Abstract:
The OAuth 2.0 public client utilizing authorization code grant is
susceptible to the code interception attack. This specification
describe a mechanism that acts as a control against this threat.
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org
<http://tools.ietf.org>.
The IETF Secretariat
--
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Chairman, OpenID Foundation
http://nat.sakimura.org/
@_nat_en
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth