Hello, I made an errata report for RFC 6749 (The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework).
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6749&eid=3904 Is there any next action I should take? Is the errata reviewed without my further action? Best Regards, Takahiko Kawasaki 2014-03-01 23:14 GMT+09:00 RFC Errata System <[email protected]>: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6749, > "The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6749&eid=3904 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Takahiko Kawasaki <[email protected]> > > Section: 11.2.2. > > Original Text > ------------- > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > o Parameter name: error > o Parameter usage location: authorization response, token response > o Change controller: IETF > o Specification document(s): RFC 6749 > > > Notes > ----- > "error" is missing and should be added to the list of Initial Registry > Contents of OAuth Parameters Registry. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC6749 (draft-ietf-oauth-v2-31) > -------------------------------------- > Title : The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework > Publication Date : October 2012 > Author(s) : D. Hardt, Ed. > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Web Authorization Protocol > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
