I would like to bring up the request by JWS draft http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakimura-oauth-requrl-05 and Symmetric PoP draft http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakimura-oauth-tcse-03.
=nat via iPhone > On Jul 3, 2014, at 12:14, Justin Richer <[email protected]> wrote: > > Mike is working on editorial updates to the Dynamic Registration core draft, > and I and the other editors plan to review the changes soon and we'll get an > updated draft published before the deadline this week. > > I will publish a refreshed Token Introspection individual submission ID for > input into the WG discussion before the deadline, and I would like to see > this become a WG item. It's already been in deployment with a number of > implementations for some time now, and I'm seeing only increasing demand for > it. > > I do not agree that we should drop the Dynamic Registration Management draft > from the WG items list. > > -- Justin > >> On 7/2/2014 10:06 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> by next Monday we have to post a draft agenda for the upcoming IETF >> meeting. >> >> If you would like to talk about a specific topic, please let us know. >> >> My impression regarding the status of our work is the following: >> >> >> -------- Current WG items ------- >> >> * Dynamic Client Registration >> >> We are waiting for an update but the document could be completed by the >> IETF meeting. ==> no presentation time. >> >> * JWT >> >> Currently in IESG processing and a new draft update has just been >> submitted. ==> no presentation time (#) >> >> * Assertion Bundle >> >> Currently in IESG processing. ==> no presentation time (#) >> >> * Dynamic Client Registration Management Protocol >> >> We had a discussion about this work at the last IETF meeting and the >> path forward looked somewhat difficult. Nothing has happened since that >> time and I am inclined to remove it from the list of WG items. >> >> * Proof-of-Possession Security >> >> We have several new documents and I hope we can turn into working group >> items already before the meeting. We would then use the meeting time to >> discuss open issues. >> >> #: No presentation time unless some challenging comments from the IESG >> surface. >> >> -------- Proposed New WG items ------- >> >> I would also like to put the following items on the agenda. >> >> * Token Introspection >> >> * draft-sakimura-oauth-tcse-03 >> >> -------- Other items ------- >> >> Phil might want to bring up this item since it was discussed on the >> list: draft-hunt-oauth-v2-user-a4c >> >> Other ideas/suggestions? >> >> Ciao >> Hannes >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
