Thanks for the quick response, Brian.  I think the text looks great.  The only 
change I'd like to suggest is in the second sentence, to change the 'may' to 
'SHOULD'.

Best regards,
Kathleen 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 19, 2014, at 1:00 AM, Brian Campbell <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> How about the following (which is intentionally similar to the text I just 
> put forth for your request for privacy consideration in 
> draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer-09)?
> 
> A SAML Assertion may contain privacy-sensitive information and, to prevent 
> disclosure of such information to unintended parties, should only be 
> transmitted over encrypted channels, such as TLS. In cases where it’s 
> desirable to prevent disclosure of certain information the client, the 
> Subject and/or individual attributes of a SAML Assertion may be encrypted to 
> the authorization server. 
> 
> Deployments should determine the minimum amount of information necessary to 
> complete the exchange and include only that information in an Assertion 
> (typically by limiting what information is included in an 
> <AttributeStatement> or omitting it altogether). In some cases the Subject 
> can be a value representing an anonymous or pseudonymous user as described in 
> Section 6.3.1 of the Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication 
> and Authorization Grants 
> [http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-16#section-6.3.1]. 
> 
> 
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Kathleen Moriarty 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I just finished my review of 
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer.  The draft 
>> looks great, thank you for all of your efforts on it!
>> 
>> I did notice that there were no privacy considerations pointing back to 
>> RFC6973, could that text be added?  The draft came after the Oauth framework 
>> publication (refernced in the security considerations), so I am guessing 
>> that is why this was missed as there are privacy considerations in the oauth 
>> assertion draft (I competed that review as well and the draft looked great.  
>> I don't have any comments to add prior to progressing the draft).
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> 
>> -- 
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Kathleen
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> 
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to