Likewise, I will not repeat stuff here but will apply appropriate changes from your comments on draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer as they apply here to draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Pete Resnick <presn...@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote: > Pete Resnick has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer-10: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I'm not going to repeat stuff that is identical to > draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer (and I did find that using > < > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-21&difftype=--html&submit=Go%21&url2=draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer-10 > > > was very helpful). Please refer to my comments on that document. > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
