Also the nae here "SPOP" is oging to be confusing with the POP token draft
that's been discussed for quite a while. Naming is allways horrible fun, but
this one is somewhat worse than some options.
-bill
On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 12:53 PM, Bill Mills <[email protected]>
wrote:
The server needs to be able to enforce policy with S256 as being required.
This means that you need to add a new error under the OAuth error registry in
this spec that allows the server to indicate the required hash.
-bill
On Sunday, October 26, 2014 4:18 PM, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]> wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol Working Group of
the IETF.
Title : Symmetric Proof of Possession for the OAuth
Authorization Code Grant
Authors : Nat Sakimura
John Bradley
Naveen Agarwal
Filename : draft-ietf-oauth-spop-01.txt
Pages : 11
Date : 2014-10-26
Abstract:
The OAuth 2.0 public client utilizing Authorization Code Grant (RFC
6749 - 4.1) is susceptible to the code interception attack. This
specification describes a mechanism that acts as a control against
this threat.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-spop/
There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-spop-01
A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-oauth-spop-01
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
