Hi Brian, If you could make a quick update, that would be easier to prevent it from getting lost. The shepherd and I will recheck the draft and then I'll move it forward.
Thanks for all of your work on this! Kathleen On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Brian Campbell <bcampb...@pingidentity.com> wrote: > Forwarding this to the WG. > > There is a word missing in the sentence noted below as well as in the > similar sentence in the SAML draft. However, I believe it should be "to the > client" rather than "about the client". > > What is the most appropriate way to handle a minor fix like this at this > stage? A note to the RFC editor? Or should I push new drafts? > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer-11#section-7 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-22#section-7 > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Benjamin Trofatter <trofat...@google.com> > Date: Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 8:11 PM > Subject: draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer draft errors > To: m...@microsoft.com, brian.d.campb...@gmail.com, cmortim...@salesforce.com > > > Hi, > > I was reading your draft and noticed a couple of typos. In 7 Privacy > paragraph 1, the last sentence reads: > > "In cases where it is desirable to prevent disclosure of certain information > the client, the JWT should be be encrypted to the authorization server." > > I'm guessing this ought to say something like: > > "In cases where it is desirable to prevent disclosure of certain information > about the client, the JWT should be encrypted to the authorization server." > > Hope this helps, > > Ben > _______________________________________________ > Ben Trofatter // Software Engineer // > trofat...@google.com // (650) 279-0512 > > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > -- Best regards, Kathleen _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
