Donald, let me also provide you with a reference to the standardization process: https://www.ietf.org/about/standards-process.html (which references https://www.ietf.org/about/process-docs.html#RFC7127)
As Justin said, standards come in different levels of maturity. Ciao Hannes On 12/16/2014 11:08 PM, Richer, Justin P. wrote: > If you'll notice, RFC6749 is also Proposed Standard, as are most of the > RFCs published out of IETF working groups. This is actually the final > state for many protocols, and it's not until many years of wide > deployment that things move up the classification stack. > > So in short, yes, it's a standard. > > -- Justin > > On Dec 16, 2014, at 4:35 PM, Donald Coffin > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > >> What is the official status of RFC 7009 Oauth 2.0 Token Revocation? >> >> >> >> Is it still a proposed standard or has it been accepted as an internet >> standard. The document implies it became a standard in August 2013, >> but several sites, including the ISOC, list it as a proposed standard. >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> Don >> >> Donald F. Coffin >> >> Founder/CTO >> >> >> >> REMI Networks >> >> 2335 Dunwoody Crossing Suite E >> >> Dunwoody, GA 30338 >> >> >> >> Phone: (949) 636-8571 >> >> Email: [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
