Hi Hannes, Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 3, 2015, at 4:50 AM, Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Kathleen, > > the statement about the IANA actions in the shepherd writeup are indeed > incorrect. I updated the writeup. Thank you! > >>> IANA Considerations: >>> The shepherd report says that there are no actions for IANA, >>> so this needs to be updated as the draft is the specification >>> required to add two new entries to an existing registry, >>> established by the parent document. It does require DE review >>> on the mailing list: [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>> If that has been done, then a pointer to the archive would be >>> helpful. > > One question: I was assuming that we would use the review list when > requests come from outside the IETF since documents that go through the > IETF OAuth working group get detailed review anyway. > > I am OK with always dropping a mail to the review lists whenever new > registry entries are created. Should we do that? Yes, that's fine and is how I read the IANA considerations. It does say a DE on that list needs to make a decision, so expert review is required. Thanks, Kathleen > > Ciao > Hannes > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
