The key part of this is establishing a registry.  That can only be done in an 
RFC.

John, I encourage you to submit text beefing up the arguments about why using 
“acr” is preferable.  The text at 
http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-jones-oauth-amr-values-00.html#acrRelationship
 is a start at that.

                                                            -- Mike

From: John Bradley [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 9:30 AM
To: Justin Richer
Cc: Mike Jones; <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication Method Reference Values Specification

I don’t personally have a problem with people defining values for AMR and 
creating a IANA registry.

That exists for ACR.

I am on record as not supporting clients requesting amr as it ai a bad idea and 
the spec mentions that at the same time it defines a new request parameter for 
it.

It is probably not something I will put any real effort into fighting, if 
people insist on it.  I will continue to recommend only using ACR in the 
request.

John B.

On Jul 23, 2015, at 9:21 AM, Justin Richer 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Useful work, but shouldn’t this be defined in the OIDF, where the “amr" 
parameter is defined?

 — Justin

On Jul 22, 2015, at 7:48 PM, Mike Jones 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Phil Hunt and I have posted a new draft that defines some values used with the 
“amr” (Authentication Methods References) claim and establishes a registry for 
Authentication Method Reference values.  These values include commonly used 
authentication methods like “pwd” (password) and “otp” (one time password).  It 
also defines a parameter for requesting that specific authentication methods be 
used in the authentication.

The specification is available at:
•        https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-amr-values-00

An HTML formatted version is also available at:
•        http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-jones-oauth-amr-values-00.html

                                                            -- Mike

P.S.  This note was also posted at http://self-issued.info/?p=1429 and as 
@selfissued<https://twitter.com/selfissued>.
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to