+1

2015-08-15 4:20 GMT+09:00 Phil Hunt <[email protected]>:

> +1
>
> Phil
>
> @independentid
> www.independentid.com
> [email protected]
>
> On Aug 14, 2015, at 12:08 PM, John Bradley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Aug 14, 2015, at 3:03 PM, Brian Campbell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> +1 for "rba"
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:52 AM, William Denniss <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Fair point. RBA is a fairly common acronym for Risk-Based Authentication,
>> how about going with "rba"? Would align with existing "mfa", "mca"
>> definitions (while also saving 1 character and helping the ambiguity issue).
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Mike Jones <[email protected]
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> I hear you, but we’re trying to keep the values short for space reasons
>>> – just like other identifiers in JWTs.  Ultimately, the values aren’t
>>> meaningful without referring to the spec in the first place, so the place
>>> to beef up the meaning is in the description in the spec – not in the “amr”
>>> value.  If you’d like to suggest any edits in that regard, have at it!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                                                             Thanks,
>>>
>>>                                                             -- Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* William Denniss [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> *Sent:* Friday, August 14, 2015 1:40 PM
>>> *To:* Mike Jones
>>> *Cc:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] “amr” Values spec updated
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Looking good, thanks for putting this together.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I wonder if we should say "risk_based" rather than just "risk" to avoid
>>> ambiguity (i.e. that it's not a risky authentication method, rather, it was
>>> risk-based).  "user" seems to work well, e.g. "user mfa pwd otp" tells a
>>> logical story.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Mike Jones <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I’ve updated the Authentication Method Reference Values spec to
>>> incorporate feedback received from the OAuth working group.  Changes were:
>>>
>>> ·        Added the values “mca” (multiple-channel authentication), “risk”
>>> (risk-based authentication), and “user” (user presence test).
>>>
>>> ·        Added citations in the definitions of Windows integrated
>>> authentication, knowledge-based authentication, risk-based authentication,
>>> multiple-factor authentication, one-time password, and proof-of-possession.
>>>
>>> ·        Alphabetized the values.
>>>
>>> ·        Added Tony Nadalin as an author and added acknowledgements.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The specification is available at:
>>>
>>> ·        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-amr-values-01
>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2ftools.ietf.org%2fhtml%2fdraft-jones-oauth-amr-values-01&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Jones%40microsoft.com%7c1f21f86f4e4a4858dff908d2a4cf71f3%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=I5MFZbd1BMANLuVeDH24boBVJ1CSwybIg3P1RqTZweU%3d>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> An HTML formatted version is also available at:
>>>
>>> ·
>>> http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-jones-oauth-amr-values-01.html
>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fself-issued.info%2fdocs%2fdraft-jones-oauth-amr-values-01.html&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Jones%40microsoft.com%7c1f21f86f4e4a4858dff908d2a4cf71f3%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=rpA2%2fLQGs5mdomEP4xBu7T9V4PWzVi2j8d1VTzPCCZg%3d>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                                                             -- Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> P.S.  This note was also posted at http://self-issued.info/?p=1437
>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fself-issued.info%2f%3fp%3d1437&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Jones%40microsoft.com%7c1f21f86f4e4a4858dff908d2a4cf71f3%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=sv5HbcRW%2bjRbYcd71MRZBcFdks%2froaDqZ%2fqTKOJrJ%2fo%3d>
>>> and as @selfissued
>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2ftwitter.com%2fselfissued&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Jones%40microsoft.com%7c1f21f86f4e4a4858dff908d2a4cf71f3%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=ex43UP5ytuIMsfe6SkABmPAvJbeOpXPbHQbnvixUNcQ%3d>
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OAuth mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fwww.ietf.org%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2foauth&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Jones%40microsoft.com%7c1f21f86f4e4a4858dff908d2a4cf71f3%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=hlMpGbGhXBCYimtMJa9IfEzWSFqXRy3kKHN8Z%2bLxjn0%3d>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>


-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Chairman, OpenID Foundation
http://nat.sakimura.org/
@_nat_en
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to