+1
Am 04.02.2016 um 17:37 schrieb John Bradley:
I support it.
I have always thought of this as informational. It is not the only way to do
it, and has no real interoperability impact.
John B.
On Feb 4, 2016, at 3:29 AM, Mike Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
I support adoption of this document by the working group as either an
experimental or information specification.
-- Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: OAuth [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 4:05 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Stateless Client Identifier for OAuth 2
Hi all,
this is the call for adoption of Stateless Client Identifier for OAuth 2, see
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bradley-oauth-stateless-client-id-02
Please let us know by Feb 2nd whether you accept / object to the adoption of
this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth working group.
Ciao
Hannes & Derek
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
