It's the OAuth-specific subset of what's already widely deployed. Nothing was
invented - just subsetted.
I think it's already as simple as possible unless the working group decides to
remove even more functionality (which it can obviously do).
-- Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: OAuth [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Anthony Nadalin
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 10:13 AM
To: Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]>; Phil Hunt
<[email protected]>; John Bradley <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Discovery spec pared down to its essence
I also think we are way far from last call (and surprised to see last call
issued) on this document as it is still very complex for something that should
be very simple
-----Original Message-----
From: OAuth [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 6:47 AM
To: Phil Hunt <[email protected]>; John Bradley <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Discovery spec pared down to its essence
On 02/18/2016 03:06 PM, Phil Hunt wrote:
> BTW. I think we are FAR from Last Call on this topic.
Thanks for your feedback, Phil. As you have seen I had issued a WGLC prior to
your message based on the claim from the authors that they believe the document
is finished.
We will, of course, take all reviews into account and see where we are with the
discovery spec. I, as the shepherd, will also do my review and I encourage many
working group members to also take a look at the document and to provide their
input.
Ciao
Hannes
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
