Should the act and may_act also be registered for Introspection Endpoint
responses?

Le ven. 4 mars 2016 21:13, Brian Campbell <[email protected]> a
écrit :

>
> A new draft of "OAuth 2.0 Token Exchange" has been published addressing
> review comments on the prior draft. The changes from -03 are listed here:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-04
>
>    o  Clarified that the "resource" and "audience" request parameters
>       can be used at the same time (via http://www.ietf.org/mail- 
> <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg15335.html>
>       archive/web/oauth/current/msg15335.html 
> <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg15335.html>).
>    o  Clarified subject/actor token validity after token exchange and
>       explained a bit more about the recommendation to not issue refresh
>       tokens (via http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/ 
> <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg15318.html>
>       msg15318.html 
> <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg15318.html>).
>    o  Updated the examples appendix to use an issuer value that doesn't
>       imply that the client issued and signed the tokens and used
>       "Bearer" and "urn:ietf:params:oauth:token-type:access_token" in
>       one of the responses (via http://www.ietf.org/mail- 
> <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg15335.html>
>       archive/web/oauth/current/msg15335.html 
> <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg15335.html>).
>    o  Defined and registered urn:ietf:params:oauth:token-type:id_token,
>       since some use cases perform token exchanges for ID Tokens and no
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 12:57 PM
> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-04.txt
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
>
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : OAuth 2.0 Token Exchange: An STS for the REST of
> Us
>         Authors         : Michael B. Jones
>                           Anthony Nadalin
>                           Brian Campbell
>                           John Bradley
>                           Chuck Mortimore
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-04.txt
>         Pages           : 28
>         Date            : 2016-03-04
>
> Abstract:
>    This specification defines a protocol for a lightweight HTTP- and
>    JSON- based Security Token Service (STS) by defining how to request
>    and obtain security tokens from OAuth 2.0 authorization servers,
>    including security tokens employing impersonation and delegation.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange/
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-04
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-04
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to