Some good irony in that message as I made a very similar mistake. The "IANA Considerations RFC 7591 / Token Introspection" link/text should say "IANA Considerations RFC 7591 / Client Registration <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7591#section-4.1>".
Sigh. On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Brian Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: > Because of my earlier message about act and may_act also being registered > for Introspection Endpoint responses > <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg16429.html> I was > looking at the IANA Considerations of RFC 7662 and it seems like some text > in the 2nd paragraph of Sec 3.1 > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7662#section-3.1> was inadvertently > copied from the IANA Considerations RFC 7591 / Token Introspection > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7591#section-4.1> and not changed to > match the new context. > > The text in Token Introspection says, "OAuth registration client metadata > names and descriptions are registered..." which doesn't seem right. I'd > expect it to say something like, "OAuth token introspection response > parameters are registered...". > > Is this the sort of thing that should be reported as errata? > > > > >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
