Makes sense to me. — Justin
> On Jun 20, 2016, at 2:46 PM, Brian Campbell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The question of if the act and may_act claims defined in Token Exchange > should also be registered/defined for Introspection Endpoint responses was > raised on this list a while back. Not much was said about it at the time but > I did put an issue in github to keep track of it. I'd like to close out that > issue and I believe that it does make sense to also register those two claims > as Introspection Response members. > > Do any WG members have strong feelings one way or the other about that? In > the absence of strong objections, I plan to make the change in the next > revision. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
